<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Business Rules Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webgambit.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/thoughts-on-business-rules-engines-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webgambit.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/thoughts-on-business-rules-engines-2/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Taylor</title>
		<link>http://webgambit.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/thoughts-on-business-rules-engines-2/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webgambit.com/?p=3#comment-212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experience with bad implementations of a class of technology should not rule out the use of that class. If the first database you used did a rotten job of row locking, would that mean that you can&#039;t use a relational database when you need to lock rows? No, of course not.
If you have a rules engine that requires manual mapping, that does not simply execute rules against your objects or that tries to pretend that English is a valid way to write &quot;code&quot; then don&#039;t use it! Go find one of the (several) that understand the need to build &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edmblog.com/weblog/2007/03/what_you_need_t.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;decision services&lt;/a&gt; that integrate easily and tightly with your systems
JT
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edmblog.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.edmblog.com&lt;/a&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experience with bad implementations of a class of technology should not rule out the use of that class. If the first database you used did a rotten job of row locking, would that mean that you can&#039;t use a relational database when you need to lock rows? No, of course not.<br />
If you have a rules engine that requires manual mapping, that does not simply execute rules against your objects or that tries to pretend that English is a valid way to write &quot;code&quot; then don&#039;t use it! Go find one of the (several) that understand the need to build <a href="http://www.edmblog.com/weblog/2007/03/what_you_need_t.html" rel="nofollow">decision services</a> that integrate easily and tightly with your systems<br />
JT<br />
<a href="http://www.edmblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.edmblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

